Apple Siri Shortcuts thoughts as a developer

Apple's Siri Shortcuts is a feature that allows users to create custom voice commands to automate certain tasks on their devices. While this feature can be useful for some simple actions, there are several limitations that make it a poor implementation of a custom scripting domain-specific language (DSL).

One major limitation is the lack of support for bulk and complex scripts. Siri Shortcuts is designed for simple, single-step actions, and it struggles with more complex tasks that require multiple steps or a high degree of precision. This can make it difficult to automate certain workflows or processes that would otherwise be more efficient with a more robust scripting language.

Another limitation is the lack of support for third-party applications. While Siri Shortcuts can interact with a limited number of built-in apps, such as Apple Music and the Camera app, it does not offer support for most third-party apps. This means that users are limited in the types of tasks they can automate, and they may need to rely on workarounds or other tools to automate certain actions.

Additionally, Siri Shortcuts can be slow and unreliable, especially when running complex scripts or when interacting with multiple third-party apps. This can make it frustrating to use and can lead to errors or unexpected results.

Another limitation of Apple's Siri Shortcuts is that it can be very difficult to debug. Since the feature is designed for simple, single-step actions, it does not offer many debugging tools or options. This can make it challenging to troubleshoot issues or errors that occur during automation, and it can also make it difficult to identify the root cause of a problem.

In addition, Siri Shortcuts does not offer support for third-party automation triggers. This means that users are limited to the built-in triggers provided by Apple, such as time of day or location. This can be a significant limitation for users who need to automate tasks based on specific events or conditions that are not supported by the built-in triggers.

For example, imagine you have a workflow that needs to be triggered when a new email arrives in your inbox, but Siri Shortcuts does not have a trigger for new emails. In this case, you would have to rely on a workaround such as using another app or service to trigger the workflow. This can add complexity and reduce the efficiency of the automation.

Furthermore, If you need to make a change to an automation script, you would have to manually go through the steps of the script and make the change, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. A more robust scripting language would allow for easy editing, testing and debugging.

For example, imagine you have a workflow that needs to be triggered when you receive a new WhatsApp message or a Skype call, but Siri Shortcuts does not have a trigger for new messages or calls. In this case, you would have to rely on a workaround such as using another app or service to trigger the workflow. This can add complexity and reduce the efficiency of the automation.

While Apple's Siri Shortcuts feature can be a useful tool for some simple actions, it is not a good implementation of a custom scripting DSL. Its lack of support for bulk and complex scripts, limited support for third-party applications, and slow and unreliable performance make it a poor choice for automating more advanced tasks.

But what about competitors ?

Even though Apple's Siri Shortcuts has certain limitations, it is still considered the best domain-specific language (DSL) when compared to its competitors in the market, such as those found on Android devices.

One of the key advantages of Siri Shortcuts is its ease of use. The interface is user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy for users to create custom voice commands and automate tasks. This is a significant advantage over other DSLs that may require more technical knowledge or experience to set up and use.

Another advantage of Siri Shortcuts is its integration with other built-in Apple apps and services. For example, Siri Shortcuts can interact with apps such as Apple Music, Reminders, and the Camera app, which makes it easy to automate tasks that involve these apps. By comparison, many Android DSLs have limited integration with built-in apps and services.

Siri Shortcuts also allows for automation based on location and time, which can be incredibly powerful. For example, users can create a shortcut that automatically turns on the "Do Not Disturb" mode when they arrive at work, or that plays a specific playlist when they leave the office. This is a feature that is not available in most other DSLs.

In terms of performance, Siri Shortcuts is generally considered more reliable and efficient than other DSLs. This is due in part to its integration with other Apple services and its ability to run on Apple's powerful hardware.

While Siri Shortcuts may have limitations when it comes to bulk and complex scripts, and third-party app integration, it is still considered the best DSL when compared to other options on the market. The ease of use, integration with built-in apps and services, location and time-based automation, and reliable performance make it a highly effective tool for automating tasks

writer: chatgpt

editor: gokhan